Week 7 Language Blog
Overall the experiment was quite interesting and comical. My
partner decided to talk about the basketball tournament (March Madness) and I was
not agreeing to his conversation therefore it was hard to express myself
without using my voice because I couldn’t argue back. I also didn’t realize how much hand gestures I
use when I speak than when I was missing one or the other it was frustrating to
me to be restricted to just using hand gestures. My partner was taking
advantage of the situation and telling me everything he agreed on and that I
disagreed on because all I could really do was wave my finger or put a hand up
so that I could communicate. Another thing was that it was like a guessing game
since he had to figure out what I was trying to say with my gestures so he
would repeat a lot of the phrases and I will either shake my head yes or no.
Overall I think I was in control because the main topic of
our conversation was me signaling him. Whatever signal or symbol I gave my
partner that was the direction that the conversation would go into. It was hard
to argue with my partner or continue the conversation so we didn’t really get
into too much detail either but we managed to get the main points across.
In my opinion I feel that if me and my partner where two different
cultures the one that would have the advantage would be my partner since he
used language instead of symbols. Using symbols gets the “big picture” across
but misses out on the details that can be communicated if you use language. Probably the culture that spoke a language
would think that they are smarter or more advanced culture than the one that uses
symbolism to communicate.
Part 2
This part of the experiment was also difficult because I am the
type of individual that uses face expression and hand gestures when I communicate
and in some instances, I also use body language. My partner agreed on how he
had to do a double take because since I was using no expression but my voice he
didn’t understand my emotion toward our conversation and he said that made it
difficult because he didn’t know where the conversation was going. So, the conversation
was basic and we didn’t get into too much detail because I was lacking emotion.
What this experiment taught me was that “signs” are useful
when we are communicating. Certain body language can make or break a conversation.
The information we get from language with symbolism or a tone of voice and
expression can say a lot or little about a conversation.
Reading body language is important because bod language
reinforces what a person is communicating. You can also observe body language
to detect information about emotions or attitudes. Body language can be used as
a clue to discrepancies in behavior to really see what a person is thinking or
feeling. Body Language can help us survive because body language can express
emotion so if we use body language in a positive way it can open doors.
Not all body language is created equal. You can be a class
and someone could be slouching; you may think they’re tired but there just
comfortable. Someone can be sitting up straight and you might get the
impression that the individual is proper but really, they have a back problem.
That is why I believe that language and symbolism go hand in hand. They average
each other to get the point across, a lot of problems can be solved with just
communicating.
Part A:
ReplyDeleteGood opening description on your first experiment.
"Overall I think I was in control because the main topic of our conversation was me signaling him."
You just spent your first paragraph explaining how limited you were in your responses and how your partner was taking advantage of your restrictions... and then you conclude that you were in control of the conversation? I want you to re-evaluate this. What does it mean to have "power" in a conversation? Could you yourself change topics? Ask questions? Steer the conversation in the direction you wanted it to go? Or did that power lie with your partner? Imagine that you were doing this experiment with a perfect stranger. Would they have put up with your restrictions or turned and walked away? Probably the latter. Did you really have the power andn control in the conversation? Or did your partner just let you have the control that you did feel?
"In my opinion I feel that if me and my partner where two different cultures the one that would have the advantage would be my partner since he used language instead of symbols."
You are miscontruing the terminology. Your partner was using "symbolic language" and you were using "signs". But you are correct that cultures using symbolic language are much better able to communicate complex ideas.
Missing the real-life example?
Part B:
Good opening description of your second experiment.
I don't disagree with your conclusions regarding the information we receive from body language, but you are only considering the situation where body language matches and supports the information you receive from spoken language. What does it tell you when the body language doesn't match the spoken language? Humans tend to use body language as a type of lie detector. If spoken words don't match with the body language, we are more inclined to believe the body language and doubt the words. Think about how being able to detect liars might help an individual's ability to survive and reproduce (which applies to the next section).
Okay on the benefits of body language, but what type of benefits do you get by being able to detect liars? You touch on this a little with your reference to "discrepancies", but this is an important point and I would have like more exploration into this and its benefits to survival.
You aren't really addressing the questions in the last section. Can you identify specific groups of people that are known for having difficulty reading body language? This could include those who are in the autism spectrum or those who are blind (though they can read vocal intonation). And can you think of a situation where it might be better to ignore body language because it is giving you false information? Do all cultures use the same system of body language? If you travel to another country, can you trust the information you get from their body language?
Hello Daisy,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading about your experience with this experiment. I too had never paid much attention to how much I use my hands when talking. It was interesting to read that you felt in control of the conversation in the first part of the experiment. I was the opposite. I felt like my partner was the one with the control because she was the one who began asking the questions and all I could do was nod my head to agree or disagree. Part 2 of the experiment was surprisingly easier for me but I agree with you that the conversation was very boring and plain. Our facial expression and tone of voice defiantly play and important role in any conversation.
Hi Daisy,
ReplyDeleteI can relate to you when you said that communicating with your partner felt like a game. I had the same result. I felt like I was in the midst of an elaborate and confusing game of charades. I found that my partner was sometimes copying my movements and that would just make it more confusing. It is interesting how you felt you were in control. I felt completely disregarded and ignored by my partner if I couldn't get my point across. She sometimes would be like "okay, moving on" if it became to difficult. I got frustrated with the jumping from topic to topic because I would have to reoutline my points every time.
That is funny that your partner decided to talk about something that you didn't agree with as soon as you could not talk. This seems to have been really good for the assignment though because it made you really engage and think about how you could get your points across without language.
ReplyDeleteOne point that the professor made in a comment on my post for the second portion was that body language can also disagree with the words that people say which usually means that someone is lying. That is something that I had not thought of before.
I think its really funny and quite interesting how your partner took control in part A. I think it was a very wise tactic of him to pick such an opinionated topic that you couldn't really do much about. He asserted his power and demonstrated in a great way how the language barrier can be such a problem and how it can create a power shift. I do find it interesting how you felt you were in control in the conversation though. That confused me a little bit and I was hoping you could elaborate on that? I'm not sure how you signaling him meant you were in control if his opinion kept overpowering yours because he was able to speak. Please correct me if I am misinterpreting this though!
ReplyDelete